Challenges of green construction in Ukraine at the stages of regulatory implementation and practical realization

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2026.1.79-94

Keywords:

green building, sustainable development, LEED, BREEAM, economic incentives, energy efficiency, real estate development, public policy, ESG, Ukraine, CAPEX, payback period, investment attractiveness

Abstract

The article examines the current state and prospects of green building development in Ukraine in the context of international experience and economic incentive mechanisms. The study highlights the growing importance of environmentally oriented construction as a response to the challenges of climate change, urban environmental degradation, increasing energy dependence and the need for sustainable urban transformation. Unlike EU countries, where LEED, BREEAM and national sustainability standards are supported by financial incentives such as tax benefits, subsidized loans, grant programmes and fast-track permitting procedures, Ukraine lacks a comprehensive system of state support. This absence makes green projects economically less attractive than traditional construction, extends payback periods and reduces investor interest.
The article presents a comparative analysis of incentive models implemented in Copenhagen, Berlin, Warsaw and London and includes an applied economic modelling case for a 10,000–25,000 m² development in Kyiv. The modelling results show that the implementation of grants, reduced-interest financing and tax reductions may shorten the investment payback period from 13 to 8–9 years and significantly increase project profitability. Based on international practices adapted to Ukrainian conditions, the paper proposes a set of economic and regulatory mechanisms, including tax reductions, concessional lending, land and planning incentives, and the introduction of a national certification standard and the “Green Fast Track” system. The study concludes that green construction should be regarded not as an additional financial burden, but as an economically justified tool for enhancing competitiveness, improving environmental performance and accelerating post-war recovery. A systemic state policy can enable Ukraine to increase the share of certified green projects to 10–15% within five years and integrate into the European sustainable development framework.

References

Allen, J. (2023). Green Building Economics and Policy. MIT Press.

European Commission. (2023). Energy performance of buildings directive (EPBD) framework. https://energy.ec.europa.eu

U.S. Green Building Council. (2023). LEED certification system overview. https://www.usgbc.org

Building Research Establishment. (2023). BREEAM technical standards. https://www.breeam.com

World Green Building Council. (2022). Global status report for buildings and construction. https://worldgbc.org

International Energy Agency. (2023). Energy efficiency indicators and building sector analysis. https://iea.org

UNEP. (2023). Buildings and Climate Global Report. https://unep.org

KfW Bankengruppe. (2023). Energy-efficient construction and refurbishment programme overview. https://www.kfw.de

NFOŚiGW – National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (Poland). (2023). Grant programmes for sustainable construction. https://nfosigw.gov.pl

Business Green. (2023). UK green infrastructure investments and carbon offset schemes. https://www.businessgreen.com

Copenhagen Municipality. (2022). CPH2025 Climate Plan: Carbon neutrality strategy. C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. https://c40.org

en.fm.dk. (2023). Danish national recovery plan and municipal green financing mechanisms. Danish Ministry of Finance.

Dudkowiak & Putyra Law Firm. (2024). Tax system in Poland: VAT and corporate taxation overview. https://dudkowiak.com

Tax Foundation. (2023). Corporate tax comparison across OECD. https://taxfoundation.org

Government of the United Kingdom. (2023). Corporation tax and commercial incentives guidance. https://www.gov.uk

State Tax Service of Ukraine. (2024). Tax legislation updates 2024–2025. https://tax.gov.ua (in Ukrainian)

Accace Ukraine. (2025). Overview of tax and financial regulatory changes for businesses. https://accace.com

Bloomberg L.P. (2017). Bloomberg European Headquarters – sustainability performance case study. https://www.bloomberg.com/company

Artelia Group. (2019). Amager Bakke / CopenHill: Project overview and performance indicators. https://www.arteliagroup.com

EDGE Buildings. (2022). Global certified green buildings database and case references. https://www.edgebuildings.com

Baker McKenzie. (2023). Ukraine: Legal framework for construction and real estate. Baker McKenzie Resource Hub.

WiseEuropa & EU Funding Observatory. (2023). EU investments in green construction and subsidy programmes. https://wise-europa.eu

State of Green. (2024). Green transition and sustainable construction policies in Denmark: Key policy tools and incentive models. https://stateofgreen.com

Greater London Authority. (2021). The London Plan 2021: Spatial development strategy for Greater London[PDF]. https://www.london.gov.uk

Published

2026-04-03

How to Cite

Hlushchenko, R. (2026). Challenges of green construction in Ukraine at the stages of regulatory implementation and practical realization. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 57(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2026.1.79-94

Issue

Section

Environmental safety and natural resources