Technology of improving the land use data accuracy for geospatial modeling tasks

Authors

  • Viacheslav Okhariev Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Senior Researcher, Acting Deputy Director for Scientific and Organizational Affairs of Institute of Telecommunications and Global Information Space of NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6270-6293
  • Serhii Pidsadnii Postgraduate of Institute of Telecommunications and Global Information Space of NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7406-500X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2026.2.72-82

Keywords:

geospatial modeling, land use data, machine learning

Abstract

The aim of the research is increasing the accuracy of land cover classification (LULC) based on Dynamic World (DW) data for the controlled territory of Ukraine. One of the key problems of such data is the regional specificity of the land use regime, which reduces the reliability of the global average world classification. The basic accuracy of the DW classification for all of Ukraine is 51%, which is significantly lower than the declared one (~72%). The exclusion of occupied and frontline territories and partial re-verification of reference points allowed to increase the accuracy to 64.58%, Kappa coefficient (κ) 0.600. Methods for refining the classification based on the seasonal amplitude of NDVI and the summer phenology filter did not provide an increase in accuracy due to the significant spectral overlap of vegetation cover classes. The method of object-oriented analysis based on cadastral boundaries showed the inaccuracy of such an approach even at the stage of material preparation. Instead, the Random Forest machine learning model, built on NDVI phenological indicators, annual mean class, and DW probability bands, achieved an accuracy of 68.10%, Kappa 0.637, which corresponds to the category of substantial agreement and is the best result among the studied methods.

References

Okhariev, V., & Pidsadnii, S. (2025). Geoinformation technology for land use dynamics monitoring based on the analysis of satellite images. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 55(3), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2025.3.87-96

Kussul, N., Shelestov, A., Yailymov, B., Yailimova, H., & Lemoine, G. (2025). Assessment of war-induced agricultural land use changes in Ukraine using machine learning applied to Sentinel satellite data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 140, 104551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104551

Zavodiana, M., Ibatullin, Sh., Sakal, O., Kharytonenko, R., & Derkulskyi, R. (2025). Detecting war-induced abandoned cropland in Ukraine using remote sensing. In International Conference of Young Professionals «GeoTerrace-2025» (pp. 1-5). https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202552075

Wang, W., Li, W., Zhang, C., & Zhang, W. (2018). Improving object-based land use/cover classification from medium resolution imagery by Markov chain geostatistical post-classification. Land, 7(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7010031

Stoliarchuk, N., & Krylov, M. (2026). Structura silskih teritorii Ukrainy do ta pid chas viyny – ekonomichni aspecty. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (84). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2026-84-162

Ramírez-Cuesta, J. M., Minacapilli, M., Motisi, A., Consoli, S., Intrigliolo, D. S., & Vanella, D. (2021). Characterization of the main land processes occurring in Europe (2000-2018) through a MODIS NDVI seasonal parameter-based procedure. Science of The Total Environment, 799, 149346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149346

Dash, P., Sanders, S. L., Parajuli, P., & Ouyang, Y. (2023). Improving the accuracy of land use and land cover classification of Landsat data in an agricultural watershed. Remote Sensing, 15(16), 4020. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15164020

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

World Food Programme. (n.d.). Ukraine Crop Maps. https://ukraine-cropmaps.com/

Olofsson, P., Foody, G. M., Herold, M., Stehman, S. V., Woodcock, C. E., & Wulder, M. A. (2014). Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote Sensing of Environment, 148, 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse. 2014.01.015

Hütt, C., Waldhoff, G., & Bareth, G. (2020). Fusion of Sentinel-1 with official topographic and cadastral geodata for crop-type enriched LULC mapping using FOSS and open data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020120

State Service of Ukraine for Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre. (n.d.). Main page. https://land.gov.ua/

Sergeieva, K., Kavats, Y., Kovrov, O., & Chumichov, D. (2025). Informatsiyna tehnologiya vyiavlennia pokynutyh silskohospodarskyh ugid na osnovi suputnykovoho monitoryngu. In Systemy kontroliu informatsii ta intelektualni tehnologii: dosiagnennia ta zastosuvannia (pp. 197-211). https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-538-2-11

Rodriguez-Galiano, V., Ghimire, B., Rogan, J., Chica, M., & Rigol-Sanchez, J. (2012). An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 67, 93-104.

Belgiu, M., & Drǎguţ, L. (2016). Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114, 24-31.

Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., ... & Duchesnay, E. (2012). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825-2830.

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-282. https://hrcak.srce.hr/89395

Brown, C. F., Brumby, S. P., Guzder-Williams, B., et al. (2022). Dynamic World, Near real-time global 10 m land use land cover mapping. Scientific Data, 9, 251. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01307-4

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Okhariev, V., & Pidsadnii, S. (2026). Technology of improving the land use data accuracy for geospatial modeling tasks. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 58(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2026.2.72-82

Issue

Section

Environmental safety and natural resources