Factors of environmental condition normalization during aircraft operation

Authors

  • Tetyana Kozlovskaya Candidate of Chemical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Aviation Transport, Kremenchuk Flight College of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kremenchuk, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6106-5524
  • Volodymyr Golovenskij Candidate of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Aviation Transport, Kremenchuk Flight College of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kremenchuk, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2320-0895
  • Volodymyr Tiahnii Candidate of Technical Sciences, Senior Researcher, Associate Professor of the Department of Aviation Transport, Kremenchuk Flight College of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kremenchuk, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5151-9801
  • Оleg Kyrychenko Lecturer of the Department of Aviation Transport, Kremenchuk Flight College of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kremenchuk, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4445-4057
  • Аndriy Tsarenko Senior Lecturer of the Department of Aviation Transport, Kremenchuk Flight College of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kremenchuk, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4810-8382

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2026.2.43-59

Keywords:

aircraft, environmental impact, engine emissions, noise exposure, sustainable aviation fuel, digital monitoring, decarbonization

Abstract

A comprehensive analysis of environmental factors shaping the impact of aviation activity on the environment has been carried out, including emissions of harmful substances, acoustic pollution, and thermal and vibrational effects. The operational characteristics of aircraft determining the scale of CO₂, NOₓ, SOₓ, CO, and particulate matter emissions at different flight phases have been systematically examined. The dependence of emission intensity on engine type, combustion parameters, and flight altitude – which influence photochemical processes in the tropopause – has been evaluated. A comparative analysis of the environmental characteristics of turbojet, turbofan, hybrid, and electric aircraft engines revealed a trend toward reduced specific fuel consumption and pollutant levels due to increased thermodynamic cycle efficiency. The nature of acoustic loads generated by engines, landing gear, and aerodynamic body elements has been studied, identifying zones of the greatest impact near airports. International standards on aircraft noise exposure and noise reduction methods have been analyzed, establishing correlations between propulsion system design parameters and noise emission levels. This enables optimization of turbine blade and nozzle architecture to minimize sound pressure levels. Secondary factors of environmental impact have been separately considered, including pollution caused by fuel and lubricants, de-icing agents, maintenance byproducts, and the formation of contrails and induced cirrus clouds that alter the atmospheric radiation balance. Monitoring data confirming spatial nonuniformity of pollution around airports and along flight corridors have been analyzed. Technological directions for minimizing harmful emissions have been summarized, particularly the implementation of low-temperature combustion technologies, and the advantages of hybrid-electric propulsion systems have been identified, achieving CO₂ emission reductions of 30–50%. The effectiveness of digital modeling of combustion chamber processes for predicting environmental performance at the design stage has been demonstrated. A conceptual model of ecological monitoring for aircraft operation has been developed, integrating Big Data analytics, Internet of Things (IoT), and digital twin technologies for real-time control of emissions, noise, and fuel consumption. The integration of monitoring results into airport environmental management systems has been proposed, following a concept that includes energy-efficient infrastructure, renewable energy utilization, and waste recycling. The necessity of applying economic incentives for aviation enterprises – such as environmental certificates, tax benefits, and support for innovative projects – has been substantiated. Special attention is paid to personnel training, environmental awareness, and institutional cooperation between aviation and environmental protection authorities.

References

Lee, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Skowron, A., Allen, M. R., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q., Wilcox, L. J., et al. (2021). The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018. Atmospheric Environment, 244, 117834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834

Burkhardt, U., & Kärcher, B. (2011). Global radiative forcing from contrail cirrus. Nature Climate Change, 1(1), 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1068

Grewe, V., Gangoli Rao, A., Grönstedt, T., Xisto, C., Linke, F., Melkert, J., Dahlmann, K., et al. (2021). Evaluating the climate impact of aviation emission scenarios towards the Paris agreement including COVID-19 effects. Nature Communications, 12(1), 3841. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24091-y

Rupcic, L., Pierrat, E., Saavedra-Rubio, K., Thonemann, N., Ogugua, C., & Laurent, A., et al. (2023). Environmental impacts in the civil aviation sector: Current state and guidance. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 119(3), 103717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103717

Singh, D. K., Sanyal, S., & Wuebbles, D. J. (2024). Understanding the role of contrails and contrail cirrus in climate change: A global perspective. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 24(16), 9219–9262. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9219-2024

Gough, W. A., & Leung, A. (2022). Do airports have their own climate? Meteorology, 1(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.3390/meteorology1020012

Keiser, D., Schnoor, L. H., Pupkes, B., & Freitag, M. (2023). Life cycle assessment in aviation: A systematic literature review of applications, methodological approaches and challenges. Journal of Air Transport Management, 110, 102418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2023.102418

Mazur, K., Saleh, M., & Hornung, M. (2024). Integrating Life Cycle Assessment in conceptual aircraft design: A comparative tool analysis. Aerospace, 11(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11010101

Khalifa, R., Alherbawi, M., Bicer, Y., & Al-Ansari, T. (2024). Fueling circularity: A thorough review of circular practices in the aviation sector with sustainable fuel solutions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 23, 200223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200223

Wayson, R. L., Fleming, G. G., & Iovinelli, R. (2009). Methodology to estimate particulate matter emissions from certified commercial aircraft engines. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 59(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.1.91

Chikishev, L. M., Sharaborin, D. K., Lobasov, A. S., Dekterev, A. A., Tolstoguzov, R. V., Dulin, V. M., & Markovich, D. M. (2022). LES Simulation of a Model Gas-Turbine Lean Combustor: Impact of Coherent Flow Structures on the Temperature Field and Concentration of CO and NO. Energies, 15(12), 4362. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124362

Wang, Z., Yang, Z. (2024). NOx Formation Mechanism and Emission Prediction in Turbulent Combustion: A Review. Applied Sciences, 14(14), 6104. https://doi.org/10.3390/ app14146104

Terrenoire, E., Hauglustaine, D. A., et al. (2022). Impact of present and future aircraft NOx and aerosol emissions on atmospheric composition and associated direct radiative forcing of climate. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22, 11987–12013. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11987-2022

Edgington-Mitchell, D. M. (2019). Aeroacoustic resonance and self-excitation in screeching and impinging supersonic jets-A review. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 18(2-3), 118–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475472X19834521

Zhao, K., Okolo, P., Neri, E., et al. (2020). Noise reduction technologies for aircraft landing gear-A bibliographic review. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 112, 100589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.100589

Rindfleisch, T. C., Alonso, J. J., Jackson, D. C., Munguía, B. C., & Bowman, N. W. (2024). A large-scale validation study of aircraft noise modeling for airport arrivals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 155(3), 1928–1949. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0025276

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2017). Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Volume I: Aircraft Noise (8th ed.). Montreal, QC: ICAO. https://store.icao.int/en/annex-16-environmental-protection-volume-i-aircraft-noise

Rutherford, D. (2025, May). The International Civil Aviation Organization’s CAEP/13 aircraft noise standards (ICCT Policy Update). International Council on Clean Transportation. https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05

Sulej-Suchomska, A. M., Szumińska, D., de la Guardia, M., Przybyłowski, P., & Polkowska, Ż. (2024). Airport runoff water: State-of-the-art and future perspectives. Sustainability, 16(18), 8176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188176

Exton, B., Hassard, F., Medina-Vaya, A., & Grabowski, R. C. (2024). Impact of carbon sources in airport de-icing compounds on the growth of Sphaerotilus natans. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, 1320487. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1320487

Olds, H. T., Corsi, S. R., & Rutter, T. D. (2022). Benzotriazole concentrations in airport runoff are reduced following changes in airport deicer formulations. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 18(1), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4468

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Kozlovskaya, T., Golovenskij, V., Tiahnii, V., Kyrychenko О., & Tsarenko А. (2026). Factors of environmental condition normalization during aircraft operation. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 58(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2026.2.43-59

Issue

Section

Environmental safety and natural resources