Sick building syndrome: uncertainty of causes and challenges of classification

Authors

  • Yurii Tsiuriupa Senior Lecturer, PhD student of the Department of Environmental Protection Technologies and Labour Safety, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2654-0270
  • Viktoriia Sakhnovska PhD student of the Department of Labor Protection and Environment, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2489-7276

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2025.2.74-83

Keywords:

Sick Building Syndrome (SBS), video ecology, classification of SBS risk factors, natural biotechnical filters

Abstract

The article addresses the problem of developing a universal classification of negative factors associated with Sick Building Syndrome (SBS), taking into account current technological, climatic, and epidemiological challenges. A critical analysis of existing approaches is provided, including classifications proposed by the WHO, CPSC, and various researchers who identify physical, chemical, biological, psychophysiological, and other groups of pollutants. It is shown that none of the existing systems fully cover the entire spectrum of external and internal factors – particularly neglecting climate influences, epidemiological threats, socio-psychological conditions, and new “video-ecological” parameters related to visual homogeneity and aggressiveness of the built environment.
Based on an interdisciplinary approach, an extended classification is proposed, dividing SBS factors into two broad groups: external (climatic, ecological, radiological, video-ecological) and internal (microclimate parameters, physical, technical, radiological, psychological, and biochemical factors). Special attention is given to video ecology – a field that examines the impact of homogeneous and aggressive visual environments on the oculomotor system and the psycho-emotional state of individuals.
The role of natural biotechnical filters – indoor plants – is also considered. These plants regulate humidity, absorb VOCs and CO₂, emit phytoncides, suppress pathogens, reduce noise, and enhance psycho-emotional well-being. Recommendations are provided for integrating plants into biophilic design as a cost-effective means of improving indoor environmental quality and preventing SBS.
The proposed classification aims to improve risk assessment, the development of preventive measures, and building operation standards to safeguard the health of residents and workers in the context of urbanization, energy efficiency, and global climate change.

References

Ravindra, K., Kaur-Sidhu, M., Mor, S., Chakma, J., & Pillarisetti, A. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clean fuel programmes in India and ensuring sustainability for household energy needs. Environmental International, 147, 106335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106335

National Human Activity Pattern Survey. The national human activity pattern survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. (2001). Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 11, 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165

Harrison, R., Thornton, C., Lawrence, R., Mark, D., Kinnersley, R., & Ayres, J. (2002). Personal exposure monitoring of particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide, including susceptible groups. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59, 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.59.10.671

Soreanu, G., Dixon, M., & Darlington, A. (2013). Botanical biofiltration of indoor gaseous pollutants – a mini-review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 229, 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.074

Klepeis, N. E., Nelson, W. C., Ott, W. R., Robinson, J. P., Tsang, A. M., Switzer, P., et al. (2001). The national human activity pattern survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 11, 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165

Vardoulakis, S. (2009). Human exposure: indoor and outdoor. Air Quality in Urban Environments, 28, 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781847559654-00085

Redlich, C. A., Sparer, J., & Cullen, M. R. (1997). Sick-building syndrome. The Lancet, 349 (9057), 1013–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07220-0

Contributors to Wikimedia projects. Sick building syndrome – Wikipedia. (n.d.). Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sick_building_syndrome (date of access: 03.05.2025).

Kim, K. J., Khalekuzzaman, M. D., Suh, J. N., Kim, H. J., Shagol, C., Kim, H.-H., et al. (2018). Phytoremediation of volatile organic compounds by indoor plants: a review. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 59, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-018-0032-0

Bandehali, S., Miri, T., Onyeaka, H., & Kumar, P. (2021). Current State of Indoor Air Phytoremediation Using Potted Plants and Green Walls. Atmosphere, 12 (4), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12040473

Organization W. H. (1989). Indoor Air Quality: Organic Pollutants. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.

The Inside Story: A Guide to Indoor Air Quality. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. (n.d.). https://www.cpsc.gov/Safety-Education/Safety-Guides/Home/The-Inside-Story-A-Guide-to-Indoor-Air-Quality (date of access: 03.05.2025).

Pro zatverdzhennia Derzhavnykh sanitarnykh norm ta pravyl «Hihiienichna klasyfikatsiia pratsi za pokaznykamy shkidlyvosti ta nebezpechnosti faktoriv vyrobnychoho seredovyshcha, vazhkosti ta napruzhenosti trudovoho protsesu» [On approval of the State sanitary norms and rules “Hygienic classification of labor by indicators of harmfulness and danger of production environment factors, severity and intensity of the labor process”] (Nakaz No. 248 dated April 8, 2014) (in Ukrainian). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0472-14#Text

Hihiienichna klasyfikatsiia pratsi (za pokaznykamy shkidlyvosti i nebezpeky faktoriv vyrobnychoho seredovyshcha, tiazhkosti i napruzhenosti trudovoho protsesu). [Hygienic classification of labor by indicators of harmfulness and danger of production environment factors, severity and intensity of the labor process] (Nakaz No. 4137-86, dated August 12, 1986, current as of May 30, 2014) (in Ukrainian). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v4137400-86#Text

Published

2025-06-20

How to Cite

Tsiuriupa, Y., & Sakhnovska, V. (2025). Sick building syndrome: uncertainty of causes and challenges of classification. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 54(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2025.2.74-83