The process of dangerous event management taking into account economic, environmental and occupational losses

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2024.3.72-87

Keywords:

risk, occupational dangers, economic risk, environmental risk, occupational risk

Abstract

Aim of the research is in risk management process development of a dangerous event taking into account economic, environmental and professional losses.
Materials and methods. To develop the process of risks management from various dangers through the integration of their losses (economic, environmental, life and health of employees), we take the most common model "bow tie", which allows to establish a cause and effect relationship between danger – a dangerous event and the severity of the consequences.
Results. As a result of the research, it was found that each hazard must be considered based on three different types of damage. This makes it possible to implement another mechanism for identifying the most significant dangerous factors that lead to significant general economic losses. In the case of risk acceptability from each individual dangerous factor, there is an additional opportunity to analyze them based on the relationship between financial activity, economic and professional losses. The second consists in determining the limits of the acceptability of risks, which are formed not only based on the total acceptable economic losses, but also taking into account the stability of the enterprise's work. This implies the need to actively invest in new technologies based on short-term and long-term perspectives. The main types of dangers are defined in the risk register, which is developed by the organization to determine the integration of dangers consisting of natural, technogenic, environmental, occupational and economic groups of dangers and dangerous factors. The authors develop the model and algorithm of risk management based on the combination of different consequences of dangers in economic, environmental character, life loss and health.
Scientific relevance. The article determines the relationship between the probability of a dangerous event and the severity of different types of consequences – economic, environmental and occupational dangers through the analysis of Euler-Venn diagrams.
Practical relevance. The authors develop the basic principles of risk management of different types of losses: economic, environmental ones, loss of life and health of employees.

References

Ispas, L., Mironeasa, C., & Silvestri, A. (2023). Risk-Based Approach in the Implementation of Integrated Management Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 15, 10251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15131025

Khalil, M.K., & Muneenam, U. (2021). Total Quality Management Practices and Corporate Green Performance: Does Organizational Culture Matter? Sustainability, 13, 11021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911021

Georgiadi, N.G. (2009). Monitoring of the State of Computer-Integrated Control Systems by Economic Development of Machine-Building Enterprises. Regional Economy, 1, 121-128. Available from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/regek_2009_1_17 [in Ukrainian].

Degtiareva, O. (2020). Pdca-cycle for achieving the energy controlling goals. Problems of systemic approach in the economy, 3(77)-1, 146-150. https://doi.org/10.32782/2520-2200/2020-3-42 [in Ukrainian].

Ryazanova, N.O. (2022). Formation of a risk management system at industrial enterprises. Academy review, 1(56), 63-71. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9589 [in Ukrainian].

Vulanović, S., Delić, M., Kamberović, B., Beker, I., & Lalić, B. (2020). Integrated management systems based on risk assessment: Methodology development and case studies. Journal Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 15 (1), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2020.1.352

Schutzbach, M., Kögel, A., Kiemel, S., Miehe, R., & Sauer, A. (2022). Principles of Management Systems for Positive Impact Factories. Sustainability, 14, 16709. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416709

Tian, Z.-P., Wang, J.-Q., & Zhang, H.-Y. (2018). An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy, and VIKOR methods. Applied Soft Computing, 72, 636-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.037

Kolenda, N., & Dytyna, О. (2021). The essence of the integrated management system of the enterprise. Economy and society, 26, https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-26-53 [in Ukrainian].

Lebedynets, V.O., & Zhurenko, V.V. (2020). To the issue of the integration of the quality management system and the environmental management system into the general management system of the National Institute of Public Health. Management and marketing as a part of modern economy, science, education, practice: materials of the 8th international science and practice distance Conference, Kharkiv, March 19. 2020. (Pp. 72-74). Available from: http://dspace.nuph.edu.ua/handle/123456789/21971 [in Ukrainian].

Trunova, O.V. (2012). Risk assessment of integrated production systems. Scientific journals of the University. Series 03. Physics and mathematics in higher and secondary school, 10, 217-227. Available from: http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/2937 [in Ukrainian].

Nechayeva, І., & Donchik, D. (2021). Use of bowtie tie technology in risk assessment practice. Economy and society, 33, https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-33-51 [in Ukrainian].

Sepp Neves, A.A., Pinardi, N., Martins, F., Janeiro, J., Samaras, A., Zodiatis, G., & De Dominicis, M. (2015). Towards a common oil spill risk assessment framework - Adapting ISO 31000 and addressing uncertainties. Journal of Environmental Management, 159, 158-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.044

Bazaluk, O., Tsopa, V., Cheberiachko, S., Deryugin, O., Radchuk, D., Borovytskyi, O., & Lozynskyi, V. (2023). Ergonomic risk management process for safety and health at work. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1253141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1253141

Taguchi, R., Tanoue, M., Yamazaki, D., & Hirabayashi, Y. (2022). Global-Scale Assessment of Economic Losses Caused by Flood-Related Business Interruption. Water, 14, 967. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060967

Syrochuk, N.A. (2010). Risk as an economic category in enterprise activity. Bulletin of the Khmelnytskyi National University. Series: "Economic Sciences", 4(4), 54-61. Available from: http://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/?page_id=457 [in Ukrainian].

Pokshevnytska, T.V. (n.d.). Criteria for environmental impact assessment. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-289-0-10 [in Ukrainian].

Selvinsimpson, S., & Chen, Y. (2022). Chapter 12 - Industry and environmental life-cycle assessment: background and perspective. Environmental Sustainability and Industries Technologies for Solid Waste, Wastewater, and Air Treatment, 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90034-8.00022-1

Doregar Zavareh, R., Dana, T., Roayaei, E., Monavari, S.M., & Jozi, S.A. (2022). The Environmental Risk Assessment of Fire and Explosion in Storage Tanks of Petroleum Products. Sustainability, 14, 10747. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710747

Porudieieva, T.V., Tkachenko, M.O., & Kramarenko, A.Yu. (2018). The concept of sustainable development in the region. Pryazovskyi economic herald, 6(11), 356-359. Available from: http://pev.kpu.zp.ua/journals/2018/6_11_uk/65.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Zhuchenko, A.M. (2016). The concept of sustainable development in modern economy. Global and national economic problems, 13, 431-434. Available from: http://global-national.in.ua/archive/13-2016/86.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Gastón de los Reyes, Markus Scholz (2019). The limits of the business case for sustainability: Don’t count on ‘Creating Shared Value’ to extinguish corporate destruction. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 221, 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.187

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Tsopa, V. A., Yavorska, O. O., Borysovska, O. O., Cheberyachko, L. M., & Nehrii, T. O. (2024). The process of dangerous event management taking into account economic, environmental and occupational losses. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 51(3), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2024.3.72-87