Calculation of the ecological and economic effect of collecting rainwater with «green» roofs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2024.1.34-48Keywords:
«green» roof, rainwater, maintenance, storage, management, net present value, ecological effect, economic effectAbstract
The problem of the availability of fresh water on the planet is substantiated and the main concepts of sustainable rainwater management, such as: "SuDS", "BMP", "LID", "GI", as well as the concept of "green" structures, are analyzed. The classification and characteristics of the main types of «green» roofs, as well as their main ecological advantages, are presented. The global market for green roofs is shown growing from USD 1.4 billion in 2020 to a CAGR of 17% from 2020 to 2027, to reach USD 4.2 billion by 2027, and is projected to the extensive type will account for more than half of the total market share. The problem of high costs for installation and maintenance of environmentally friendly solutions for the roof is highlighted, therefore the aim of the work is to calculate the ecological and economic effect of collecting rainwater obtained from "green" roofs, in contrast to traditional roofs, and to conduct an economic analysis of social and cost benefits. what green roofs generate over their life cycle using the Net Present Value (NPV) method. The ecological and economic effect of collecting rainwater with "green" roofs was calculated for four cities of Ukraine: Kyiv, Kharkiv, Dnipro and Lviv. According to the results of calculations, the ecological effect of EE ranges from 394,000 m3 in the city of Dnipro and 450,000 m3 in Kharkiv to 567,000 m3 in Kyiv and 647,000 m3 in Lviv. The difference in the obtained calculations depends primarily on the selected area of "green" roofs, which was the lowest in the city of Dnipro (1.47 million m2) and the highest in the city of Kyiv (2.50 million m2), the values of which were chosen conditionally, as well as from the indicator of the average annual amount of precipitation, which is the highest in the city of Lviv (740 mm). The average value of the ecological effect of EE in relation to water retention in the analyzed cities was calculated, which was 515,000 m3. By multiplying EE and water price, the average ECE for these 4 cities was determined to be $380,500. It was concluded that the price of water is a decisive dependent variable in the calculation of ECE. The calculation of the economic analysis of the profitability of investments in "green" roofs corresponding to 1 m2 of intensive and extensive "green" roofs, which was carried out on the basis of the net present value method (NPV). It is shown that investment costs for "green" roofs include the following stages: design of "green" roofs; installation of the "green" roof system; installation of waterproofing; production of substrate for roofs and its installation; selection and planting of plants on the roof; installation of the irrigation system. It is substantiated that both intensive and extensive "green" roofs have a positive indicator of the net present value of NPV. The average NPV per 1 m2 of an intensive "green" roof is more than 10 times higher than the average NPV per 1 m2 of an extensive "green" roof.
References
The United Nations world water development report 2021: valuing water (2021). 187 р.
Tkachenko, T. M., Mileikovskyi, V. O., & Kravchenko, M. V. (2023). Impact of «green» roofs on rainwater management: review of scientific research and perspectives of use. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 46(2), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2023.2.35-53 [in Ukrainian].
Green Roof Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Type (Extensive, Intensive), By Application (Residential, Commercial, Industrial), By Region (North America, APAC, MEA), And Segment Forecasts, 2020–2027. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/green-roof-market
Li, W.C., & Yeung, K.K.A. (2014). A comprehensive study of green roof performance from environmental perspective. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ, 3, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.05.001
Vijayaraghavan, K. (2016). Green roofs: A critical review on the role of components, benefits, limitations and trends. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 57, 740–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.119
Oberndorfer, E., Lundholm, J., Bass, B., Coffman, R.R., Doshi, H., Dunnett, N., & Rowe, B. (2007). Green roofs as urban ecosystems: Ecological structures, functions, and services. BioScience, 57, 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1641/B571005
Bianchini, F., & Hewage, K. (2012). Probabilistic social cost-benefit analysis for green roofs: A lifecycle approach. Build Environ., 58, 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.07.005
Carter, T., & Keeler, A. (2008). Life-cycle cost-benefit analysis of extensive vegetated roof systems. J. Environ. Manag., 87, 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.024
Yuliani, S., Hardiman, G., & Setyowati, E. (2020). Green-roof: The role of community in the substitution of green-space toward sustainable development. Sustainability, 12, 1429. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041429
Jiawei Fu, Karine Dupre, Silvia Tavares, David King, & Zsuzsa Banhalmi-Zakar (2022). Optimized greenery configuration to mitigate urban heat: A decade systematic review. Frontiers of Architectural Research., 2022, 11, 3, 466-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.12.005
Fleck, R., Pettit, T.J., Douglas, A.N., Irga, P.J., & Torpy, F.R. (2020). Botanical biofiltration for reducing indoor air pollution. Bio-Based Materials and Biotechnologies for Eco-Efficient Construction, 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819481-2.00015-5
Weerakkody, U., Dover, J.W., Mitchell, P., & Reiling, K. (2017). Particulate Matter Pollution Capture by Leaves of Seventeen Living Wall Species with Special Reference to Rail-Traffic at a Metropolitan Station. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 27, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.07.005
Tkachenko, T.M., & Mileikovskyi, V.O. (2017). Doslidzhennia teploperedachi v enerhoefektyvnykh zelenykh pokrivliakh. Ventylatsiia, osvitlennia i teplohazopostachannia, 21, 37-48 [in Ukraine]. http://vothp.knuba.edu.ua/issue/view/10141
Tkachenko, T., & Mileikovskyi, V. (2017). Research of Cooling Effect of Vegetation Layer of Green Structures in Construction. International scientific and practical conference. World science. Dubai, 1, №7(23), 22-24. http://repositary.knuba.edu.ua//handle/987654321/5694
Kravchenko, M.V., Tkachenko, T.M., & Mileikovskyi, V.O. (2023). Modifikatsiia "zelenoi" pokrivli z vykorystanniam tekhnichnykh rishen dlia zmenshennia nehatyvnoho vplyvu zlyvovykh vod v miskykh umovakh. Problemy vodopostachannia, vodovidvedennia ta hidravliky, 43, 16-28 [in Ukraine]. https://doi.org/10.32347/2524-0021.2023.43.16-28
Yujiro Hirano, Tomohiko Ihara, Kei Gomi, & Tsuyoshi Fujita. (2019). Simulation-Based Evaluation of the Effect of Green Roofs in Office Building Districts on Mitigating the Urban Heat Island Effect and Reducing CO2 Emissions. Sustainability, 11, Iss. 7, 2055. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072055
Azkorra, Z., Pérez, G., Coma, J., Cabeza, L.F., Bures, S., Alvaro, J.E., Erkoreka, A., & Urrestarazu, M. (2015). Evaluation of green walls as a passive acoustic insulation system. Applied Acoustics, 89, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.09.010
Wooster, E.I.F., Fleck, R., Torpy, F., Ramp, D., & Irga, P.J. (2022). Urban green roofs promote metropolitan biodiversity: A comparative case study. Building and Environment, 207, 108458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108458
Qiang Ji, Hye-Jeong Lee, & Sung-Yoon Huh (2022). Measuring the economic value of green roofing in South Korea: A contingent valuation approach. Energy and Buildings, 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111975
Fabricio Bianchini, & Kasun Hewage (2012). Probabilistic social cost-benefit analysis for green roofs: A lifecycle approach. Building and Environment, 58, 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.07.005
Inês Teotónio, Cristina Matos Silva, & Carlos Oliveira Cruz (2018). Eco-solutions for urban environments regeneration: The economic value of green roofs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.084
Aflaki et al. (2017). Urban heat island mitigation strategies: A state-of-the-art review on Kuala Lumpur, Singapore and Hong Kong. Cities, 62, 131-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.003
Hoekstra, A.Y. (2003). Virtual Water Trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade, Delft, The Netherlands, 12–13 December 2002; Value of Water Research Report Series No. 12; UNESCO-IHE: Delft, The Netherlands.
Vnutrishni vody ta vodni resursy Ukrainy. Retrieved November, 20, 2023 from http://zno.academia.in.ua/mod/book/view.php?id=2439#:~:text=Поверхневі%20й%20підземні%20води%2C%20які,використання%20тільки%2056%20км3
Borowski, P.F. (2020). Nexus between water, energy, food and climate change as challenges facing the modern global, European and Polish economy. AIMS Geosci, 6, 397–421.
Taryfy na vodopostachannia ta vodovidvedennia. Retrieved November, 20, 2023 from https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/tariff/water/
Bus, A., & Szelągowska, A. (2021). Green Water from Green Roofs – The Ecological and Economic Effects. Sustainability, 13(4), 2403. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042403
Metodychni rekomendatsii iz zabezpechennia efektyvnoho vidvedennia poverkhnevykh vod. Nakaz Ministerstva z pytan zhyllovo-komunalnoho hospodarstva Ukrainy. 23.12.2010, N 470.
Zemlianka nashoyi mriyi. Retrieved November, 20, 2023 from https://umoloda.kyiv.ua/number/2555/208/90236/
Dykan, M.I., Rubenok, T.M., Mishchenko, V.Ya. (2019). Prognozuvannia efektyvnosti investytsiynykh proektiv z urakhuvanniam faktoriv, shcho poslabliuiut' nehatyvnyi vplyv. Innovatsii v ekonomitsi, 5, 137–141 [in Ukraine].
Zelena pokrivlia: proektuvannia ta montazh. Retrieved November, 20, 2023 from https://euroroofing.ua/green_roofs/
Systemy "zelenykh" dakhiv. Retrieved from https://zinco.com.ua/systems
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kravchenko М.V., Tkachenko T.M.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal «Environmental safety and natural resources» works under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
The licensing policy is compatible with the overwhelming majority of open access and archiving policies.