Features of the assessment of occupational risks in truck transportation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2023.2.85-99Keywords:
labor safety, occupational risk, risk assessment, traffic accident, dynamic modelAbstract
The purpose of the article is to develop a process of managing the professional (dynamic) risks in freight transportation due to changes in time of dangerous factors.
To build the process of managing the professional (dynamic) risks of truck transportation, the main principles of system dynamics using the "tie-butterfly" model for establishment the causal and reciprocal relationships between dangerous factors affecting the drive were used.
A model of the connection of dangerous factors of the internal and external environment of the organization, related to their negative impact on the increase in the probability of the occurrence of a dangerous event (incident) and the degree of severity over time, has been developed. Based on the interaction of the probability of the occurrence of a dangerous event and the severity of the consequences, taking into account changes in the physical and psychological state of the driver, it became possible to develop a dynamic model for assessing the driver's professional risk. Changes in professional (dynamic) risks during the time of a truck driver are proposed for analysis: by hours of the day (from 00:00-24:00 hours); by days of the week (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday); by season (spring, summer, autumn, winter). Taking into account the interaction of three main components: the presence of a threat or danger, the interaction between a truck and a person, the presence of a catalyst (physical and psychological state of the driver), the amount of professional risk is determined. To check the adequacy of the assessments, taking into account the change in the influence of dangerous factors on the probability of the occurrence of a dangerous event and the degree of severity of injuries from it with a time, an algorithm that allows to monitor every step in the management of professional risks was developed. It was established that an unacceptable level of risk is fixed at night and in winter, under inappropriate climatic conditions, which requires the development of effective safety precautions.
The scientific novelty consists in the justification of a dynamic model from assessing the professional risk of a driver, based on the interaction of the probability of the occurrence of a dangerous event and the severity of the consequences, taking into account changes in the physical and psychological state of the driver.
The practical significance lies in the development of forms for assessing the driver's professional risk.
References
Rasmussen, J., & Svedung, I. (2000). Proactive Risk Management in a Dynamic Society. Karlstad, Sweden: Swedish Rescue Services Agency. ISBN: 91-7253-084-7.
Cheng, G., Cheng, R., Zhang, S., & Sun, X. (2019). Risk evaluation method for highway roadside accidents. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 11(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1687814018821743
Kizito, A., & Semwanga, A.R. (2020). Modeling the Complexity of Road Accidents Prevention: A System Dynamics Approach. International Journal of System Dynamics Applications, 9(2), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSDA.2020040102
Goh, Y.M., Love, P.E.D., Stagbouer, G., & Annesley, C. (2012). Dynamics of safety performance and culture: A group model building approach. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 48, 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.010
Zhu, Y.J. (2011). The Basis and Method for Engineering Project Risk Identification. Modern Enterprise, 9, 24-25.
Xu, G.Q. & Zou, J. (2006). The Method of System Dynamics: Principle, Characteristics and New Development. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 8, 72-77.
Wan, J., & Liu, Y. (2014). A System Dynamics Model for Risk Analysis during Project Construction Process. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(6), 451-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.26052
Ferdman, G.P. (2020). Some proposals for the accession of Ukraine’s transport security to the european transport security system. Journal Scientific notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University, series «Public Management and Administration», 31(70), №4, 134-139 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32838/TNU-2663-6468/2020.4/21
Tsopa, V., Cheberiachko, S., Yavorska, O., Deryugin, O., & Bas, I. (2022). Increasing the safety of the transport process by minimizing the professional risk of a dump truck driver. Mining of mineral deposits, 16(3), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining16.03.101
Soloviova, O., & Valko, A. (2020). Prerequisites for implementing security measures at the airport. Science-based technologies, 46(3), 407-414 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.18372/2310-5461.47.14939
Yao, BZ, Yang, CY, & Yao, JB. (2010). Tunnel surrounding rock displacement prediction using support vector machine. Int J Comput Intell Syst, 3, 843-852.
Yu, B, Zhu, HB, Cai, WJ, et al. (2013). Two-phase optimization approach to transit hub location – the case of Dalian. J Transport Geogr, 33, 62-71.
Tsopa, V. (2018). Basic methodology of risk management in management systems. Okhorona pratsi, 1, 18-26 [in Ukrainian].
Yao, BZ, Hu, P, Lu, XH, et al. (2014). Transit network design based on travel time reliability. Transport Res C Emerg Tech. 15. Yu, B, Zhang, C, Kong, L, et al. (2014). System dynamics modeling for the land transportation system in a port city. SIMULATION, 90(6), 706-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549714533619
Yao, G., Huang, H., Sun, H., Wei, J. & Sun, G. (2010). The whole vehicle system dynamics modeling and simulation for transportation vehicle. In International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering (pp. 698-701). https://doi.org/10.1109/MACE.2010.5536044
Tavakkolimoghaddam, S., Hadji Molana, S.M., Javadi, M. & Azizi, A. (2022). System dynamics model for intra-city multimodal transportation considering behavioral indicators and demand under uncertainty conditions. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 19(4), 533-559. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-07-2021-0249
Starikov, А.I., Solarov, О.О., Mikulina, M.O., Tarelnyk, N.V. & Tatsenko, O.V. (2021). Using Different Approaches to Solving Logistics Tasks. Visnyk VPI, 4, 85-91 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.31649/1997-9266-2021-157-4-85-91
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tsopa V.A., Cheberiachko S.I., Yavorska O.O., Nehrii T.O., Tkachenko T.M., Deryugin O.V.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal «Environmental safety and natural resources» works under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
The licensing policy is compatible with the overwhelming majority of open access and archiving policies.
