The analysis of methods of investigation of negative impact on mesofauna and microbiology of soils of contaminated solutions for foam makers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2020.2.88-98Keywords:
foaming solutions, surfactants, environmental assessment, microbiological of soils monitoring, phytotoxicityAbstract
Nowdays the problem of fires is becoming more widespread and global in scale. According to statistics published by the Ukrainian Research Institute of Civil Protection obtained as a result of analysis of the fire registration cards of the SES of Ukraine – for 11 months of 2019 the number of fires in Ukraine increased by 23.1% compared to the same period last year. The most common extinguishing agent being used by fire and rescue units today is а foam. The main component of different foaming agents are surfactants. Their excessive emission into the environment leads to pollution of the surrounding areas. The constant increasing of the land areas affected by the effects of firefighting influence both the state of the environment in the region as a whole and the level of soil fertility. Microbiological indicators and the content of harmful substances in crops are increasing and thus the negative impact on public health grows. The analysis of microbiological monitoring methods with the aim of the contaminated solutions foam makers impact on the nearby territories’ soils estimation has been carried out. The pros and cons of modern physical and chemical methods of soils quality estimation have been defined. The necessity of microbiological methods usage which allow to get full and sufficient information not only about the pollution volume, but also to rate the results of such pollution has been justified. It is determined that in order to obtain the most complete and objective information about the microbiological condition of soils contaminated with foaming agents for fire extinguishing, a complex of bioindication methods should be used. It should include a growth test and a chromosome aberration test, with the use of test organisms that are most sensitive to the chemical composition of the test solution for firefighting.
References
Ukrainian Civil Protection Research Institute (2019). Statystyka pozhezh. Retrieved from https://undicz.dsns.gov.ua/ua/STATISTIKA-POZHEZH.html.
Lisniak, A.A., Tryhub, V.V., Senchykhin, Yu.M., & Syrovoi, V.V. (2016). Zvit pro naukovo-doslidnu robotu napysannia ta pidhotovka do druku navchalnoho posibnyka "Pozhezhna taktyka". Retrieved from https://www.dsns.gov.ua/files/2017/4/25/zvit_ osvita_i_nauka/7_Пожежна%20тактика.pdf.
Borovykov, V. (2003). Problemni pytannia zastosuvannia pinoutvoriuvachiv dlia hasinnia pozhezh. [Problematic issues of application of foaming agents for fire fighting]. Byznes y bezopasnost, 4, 75-78.
Hromovyk, A.Y. (2010). Sovremennie instrumentalnie metody v pochvovedenyy. Teoryia y praktyka. [Modern instrumental methods in soil science. Theory and practice]. Voronezh.
Vasenko, O.H., Rybalova, O.V., Artemiev, S.R., Horban, N.S., Korobkova, H.V., Polozentsieva, V.O., Kozlovska, O.V., Matsak, A.O., & Savichiev, A.A. (2015). Intehralni ta kompleksni otsinky stanu navkolyshnoho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha: monohrafiia. [Integral and complex environmental assessments: a monograph]. Kharkiv.
Moroz, O.A. (2015). Fizyko-khimichni metody analizu hruntiv. [Physico-chemical methods of soil analysis]. Studentskyi visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu vodnoho hospodarstva ta pryrodokorystuvannia, 1, 54-57.
Horova, A. (2008). Otsinka toksychnosti hruntiv Chervonohradskoho hirnychopromyslovoho raionu za dopomohoiu rostovoho testu. [Soil toxicity assessment of Chervonohrad mining district with the help of growth test.] Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu, 48, 189-194.
Mylenka, M.M. (2009). Bioindykatsiina otsinka ekolohichnoho stanu Burshtynskoi urboekosystemy. [Bio-indication estimation of Burshtyn urban ecosystem]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Dnipropetrovsk.
Bubnov, A.H., Buimova, S.A., Hushchyn, A.A., & Yzvekova, T.V. (2007). Byotestovi analyz – intehralnyi metod otsenky kachestva obektov okruzhaiushchei sredy. [Biotest analysis is an integral method of assessing the quality of environmental objects ]. Ivanovo.
Azarova, S.V. (2011). Opyt prymenenyia metodov byotestyrovanyia dlia otsenky toksychnosty otkhodov hornodobyvaiushchykh predpryiatyi. [Experience in applying biotesting methods to assess waste toxicity of mining enterprises]. In IX Mezhdunarodnaia byoheokhymycheskaia shkola. p. 36-39.
Maznytska, V.O., Trush, V.Ye., Novokhatko, O.V., & Kraskovska, M.A. (2013). Biotestuvannia hirnychoi masy z vidvaliv Malokokhnivskoho karieru [Biotesting of rock mass from the piles of the Malokokhnivskyi quarry]. Naukovi tekhnolohii, 1, 127-130.
Azarova, S.V. (2005). Otkhody predpryiatyi y kompleksnaia otsenka ih opasnosty dlia okruzhaiushchei sredy ( na prymere obiektov respublyky Khakasyia). [Waste of enterprises and complex assessment of their danger to the environment (on the example of objects of the Republic of Khakassia]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Tomsk.
Beshlei, Z.M., Beshlei, S.V., Baranov, V.I., & Terek, O.I. (2014). Vykorystannia roslynnykh test-system dlia otsinky toksychnosti tekhnohenno zabrudnenykh substrativ. [The use of plant test systems to evaluate the toxicity of technogenically contaminated substrates]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu, 1, 97-102.
Hubachov, O.I. (2010). Osoblyvosti vykorystannia roslyn dlia biotestuvannia hruntiv z metoiu vyznachennia rivnia ekolohichnoi bezpeky promyslovykh terytorii. [Features of using plants for soil biotesting to determine the level of environmental safety of industrial areas]. Naukovyi visnyk KUEITU, 164-171.
Honhalskyi, K.B. (2004). Pochvennye bezpozvonochnye kak byoyndykatori promishlennoho vozdeistvyia v lesnykh ekosystemakh tsentra evropeiskoi Rossyy. [Soil invertebrates as bioindicators of industrial impact in forest ecosystems of the center of European Russia]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Moskva.
Pinchuk, M.O. (2018). Doslidzhennia hruntu. [Soil research]. Natsionalnyi ekoloho-naturalistychnyi tsentr uchnivskoi molodi, p. 32.
Horova, A.I., Ryzhenko, S.A., & Skvortsova, T.V. (2007). Metodychni rekomendatsii «Obstezhennia ta raionuvannia terytorii za stupenem vplyvu antropohennykh chynnykiv na stan obiektiv dovkillia z vykorystanniam tsytohenetychnykh metodiv». [Methodological recommendations "Survey and zoning of the territory by the degree of influence of anthropogenic factors on the state of environmental objects using cytogenetic methods"]. Donetsk.
Melekhova, O.P., Ehorova, E.Y., & Evseeva, T.Y. (2007). Byolohycheskyi kontrol okruzhaiuchei sredy: byoyndykatsyia y byotestyrovanye. [Biological control of the environment: bioindication and biotesting]. Moskva.
Levyk, V.I. (2009). Fermentatyvna aktyvnist hruntiv tekhnohennykh terytorii Nemyrivskoho rodovyshcha sirky. [Enzymatic activity of soils of the technogenic territories of the Nemyriv sulfur field]. Zbirnyk nakovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni H.S. Skovorody, 11, 131-136.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Sergіi S. Poroshenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal «Environmental safety and natural resources» works under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
The licensing policy is compatible with the overwhelming majority of open access and archiving policies.
