Some critical comments on the quality of environmental impact assessment reports for small hydropower plants in Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2019.4.43-59

Keywords:

feasibility, hydrotechnical construction, environmental impact assessment report, small hydropower, small hydropower plants, planned activity

Abstract

Nowadays, small hydropower in Ukraine has a small share in the national energy balance. However, in Ukraine small hydropower has been still developing, but its development is largely spontaneous, not accompanied by scientific and technical researches of small rivers, as well as an appropriate analysis of the impact of small hydropower plants on the environment. As a result, there is an increasing resistance to the building of new hydropower plants in the country by environmentalists, activists and the public.
The issue of small hydropower in our country has become a new topical challenge in connection with the adoption in 2017 of the Act of Ukraine “On Environmental Impact Assessment”. According to this Act, all hydropower plants on rivers, regardless of their capacity, including small hydropower plants, are classified as planned activities and objects that can have a significant environmental impact and are subject to environmental impact assessment.
Since 2017, in accordance with the Act, a large number of environmental impact assessment reports have been submitted to the Unified Register concerning planned activities related to the construction of new small hydropower plants, which were prepared by various entities, including universities.
The main objective of the research was to analyze the reports presented in the Unified Register and the formulation of practical comments on the quality of their preparation, the accuracy and completeness of information on the environmental impacts of the planned small hydropower plants. The purpose of the article is to familiarize professionals in the various fields of knowledge relevant to the issue, in particular, hydraulic engineers, hydropower engineers, environmentalists, as well as potential investors in small hydropower, public activists and the general public with these remarks.
Totally, 16 of reports were analyzed in detail. The main shortcomings of the performed environmental impact assessments of the new small hydropower plants planned to build were noted, including the lack of proper analysis of alternatives and scientifically sound forecasts, the incompetence of experts in the issues related to the environmental impacts of hydraulic structures. Practical recommendations were formulated that can help improve the quality of the environmental impact assessment of small hydropower plants, with the aim of avoiding environmentally hazardous decisions, taking into account the various environmental and social risks associated with small hydropower facilities.

Author Biographies

Dmytro V. Stefanyshyn, Institute of Telecommunications and Global Information Space of NASU, Kyiv, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Rivne

D. S. (Engineering), Lead researcher, Professor of Department

Yurii S. Vlasiuk, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Rivne

Postgraduate student

References

Small hydropower of the world. Retrieved from https://msd.in.ua/mala-gidroenergetika-svitu/. (in Ukrainian).

Vlasyuk, Yu.S., Stefanyshyn, D.V. (2018). On problems and prospects of small hydropower engineering in Ukraine. Mathematical Modeling in Economy, №1, 2018, 126-138. (in Ukrainian).

Vasko, P.F., Vasko, V.P., Ibrahimova, M.R. (2015). Small hydropower in the structure of the electricity sector of Ukraine. Renewable energy, № 3, 53-61. (in Ukrainian).

Information on power and volumes of electricity produced by renewable energy objects, which have a “green” tariff (as of September 30, 2018). 4 p. Retrieved from http://saee.gov.ua/sites/default/files/VDE.pdf. (in Ukrainian).

Since the beginning of the year, over € 2 billion has been invested in green energy. URL: https://www.epravda.com.ua/news/2019/10/7/652329/.

Stefanyshyn, D.V., Vlasyuk, Yu.S. (2018). To the issue of comparative analysis of water-energy characteristics of small and large hydroelectric power plants of Ukraine being parts of waterworks with reservoirs. Mathematical Modeling in Economy, №2, 71-83. (in Ukrainian).

Orzel, O. (2015). Small HPSs: evil or good? Big monopolies play without rules against the representatives of advanced technology posing a serious threat to the giants which lose their over profits. October 16, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.epravda.com.ua/columns/ 2015/10/16/563528/?fbclid=IwAR0M0qcj9ILo7-vQUUB6m0N_xSYFmky_xXO6au96_Q 2GqHYDV6926yvE498. (in Ukrainian).

WWF’s position on the development of small hydropower in Ukraine. (2018). Retrieved from http://wwf.ua/materials/official/?uNewsID=323990. (in Ukrainian).

On Environmental Impact Assessment: Law of Ukraine No. 2059-VIII of 23 May 2017 Official Bulletin of Ukraine. (2017). №50. P. 5. Verkhovna Rada (BBR) Bulletin, No. 29, Art. 315. Retrieved from http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2059-19. (in Ukrainian).

Development of heat power engineering and hydropower. (2013). Baseev, Ye. T., Bileka, B. D., Vasiliev, Ye. P., et al.; Science ed. Klymenko, V. M., Landau, Yu. O., Sigal, I. Ya. 399 p. Retrieved from http://energetika.in.ua/ua/books/book-3/part-2/section-2/2-8. (in Ukrainian).

By 2020, 11% of Ukraine's energy will be generated from renewable sources. Retrieved from http://ecotown.com.ua/news/Do-2020-roku-v-Ukrayini-11-enerhiyi-vyroblyatymetsya- z-vidnovlyuvanykh-dzherel/. (in Ukrainian).

Overview of the situation regarding hydropower in Ukraine. Retrieved from https: //censor.net.ua/blogs/4415/oglyad_situats_schodo_gdroenegetiki_v_ukran. (in Ukrainian).

Environmental Impact Assessment. Unified registry. Retrieved from http://eia.menr. gov.ua/search. (in Ukrainian).

Law of Ukraine “On Extremely Dangerous Objects”. (2001). VRU information. № 15. Art. 73. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2245-14. (in Ukrainian).

Methods for identifying potentially dangerous objects. (2006). Approved by the order of the Ministry of Emergencies of Ukraine dated 23.02.2006 at № 98. Registered with the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine on 20.03.2006 at № 286/12160. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/z0286-06. (in Ukrainian).

DBN B.2.4-3: 2010. Hydrotechnical, energy and reclamation systems and structures, underground mining. Waterworks. Substantive provisions. (2010). Kyiv: Ministry of Regional Development and Construction of Ukraine, 37 p. (in Ukrainian).

Identification and Designation of Heavily Modified and Artificial Water Bodies. (2002). CIS Working Group 2.2. 10 December 2002. 11 p. Retrieved from http://www.wrrl-info.de/docs/ HMWBpolicysummary101202.pdf.

Stefanyshyn, D.V. (2018). Grounding the optimal scenario for the introduction of new aggregates at the hydroelectric power plants in Ukraine taking into account the risk. Hydropower of Ukraine, №3-4, 24-29. (in Ukrainian).

Ivashintsov, D.A., Stefanishin, D.V., Veksler, A.B. (1993). Ecological and sociodemographic consequences of hydrotechnical construction (Problems of safety and risk). Power Technology and Engineering (formerly Hydrotechnical Construction), Vol. 27, Num. 12, 685-691.

Environmental experience gained from reservoirs in operation. Trans. of the 18-th Int. Cong. on Large Dams. Vol. 2. Q.69. Durban-South Africa, 1994, 780 p.

Published

2019-12-26

How to Cite

Stefanyshyn, D. V., & Vlasiuk, Y. S. (2019). Some critical comments on the quality of environmental impact assessment reports for small hydropower plants in Ukraine. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 32(4), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2019.4.43-59