Green building BREEAM in Ukraine

Authors

  • Тetyana I. Kryvomaz Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4161-9702
  • Irene Scudu Building Research Establishment Group, London, United Kingdom
  • David Leonard Building Research Establishment Group, London, United Kingdom
  • David Minter Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International, London, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2019.1.5-15

Keywords:

green building, certifications rating system, environmental safety

Abstract

It is recognised that world construction is responsible for substantial amounts of harmful emissions, so the need to save energy and mitigate environmental problems fostered the concept of a green building. This is structures that are sited, designed, built, renovated and operated to energy efficient guidelines, and that they will have a positive environmental, economic and social impact over their life cycle. The study begins with a review of the main stages through which this technology developed in the Great Britain. Notable successes achieved through green building in the UK are then highlighted. There is excellent potential to implement Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) in Ukraine because, although the building sector is very active, the technology in current use is not up to international environmental standards. At the same time Ukraine is actively subscribing to international conventions which reduce environmental pollution, and seeks to improve national standards in accordance with international requirements. Examples of BREEAM certified green building are already present in Ukraine, and the general economic and political situation seems ready to welcome implementation of green building throughout the country.

Author Biographies

Тetyana I. Kryvomaz, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Kyiv

Dr, professor of Departament of Labour and Environment Protection

Irene Scudu, Building Research Establishment Group, London

Chief Technical Advisor

David Leonard, Building Research Establishment Group, London

Head of BREEAM's new construction team

David Minter, Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International, London

Dr, Leading Researcher

References

Abdul, Y., and Quartermaine, R. (2014). Delivering sustainable buildings: savings and payback. London: BRE, Sweett Group. IHS BRE Press.

Baynes, T., Bergesen, J., Labbé, F., Musango, J.K., Ramaswami, A., Robinson, B., Salat, S., Suh, S., Currie, P., Fang, A., Hanson, A., Kruit, K., Reiner, M., Smit, S., Tabory, S. A Report by the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. The Weight of Cities summary report (2018). Available online: http://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/weight-cities.

Bienert, S. (2014). Extreme weather events and property values: Assessing new investment frameworks for the decades ahead. London: Urban Land Institute.

Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. Available online: https://www.breeam.com/

Building Research Establishment Trust. Available online: https://bregroup.com/bretrust.

De Luca, P., Carbon, I., and Nagy, J. B. (2017). Green building materials: a review of state of the art studies of innovative materials. Journal of Green Building. 12 (4): 141-161.

Development Strategy of the City of Kyiv until 2025 [Стратегія розвитку міста Києва до 2025 року затверджено рішенням Київської міської ради №824/7060 від 15 грудня 2011 р., нова редакція 2016 р.]

Fekry, A. A., El Zafarany, A. M, Shamseldin, A. K. M. (2014). Develop an environmental assessment technique for human comfort requirements in buildings. HBRC Journal. 10(1): 1-9.

Huo, X. and Yu, A. T.W. (2017). Analytical review of green building development studies. Journal of Green Building. 12(2): 130-148.

Kim, J.J., Goodwin, C.W., and Kim, S. (2017). Communication turns green construction planning into reality. 12 (1): 168-186.

Lee, W. L. (2012). Benchmarking energy use of building environmental assessment schemes. Energy and Buildings. 45: 326-334.

Soulti, E., and Leonard, D. (2016). The value of BREEAM A review of latest thinking in the commercial building sector. London: BRE Global Ltd.

The Weight of Cities: Resource Requirements of Future Urbanization. Swilling, M., Hajer, M. (2018). International Resource Panel. Available online: http://www.resourcepanel.org.

Thompson, M., Cooper, I., Gething, B. (2015). The business case for adapting buildings to climate change: Niche or mainstream? Innovate UK Technology Strategy Board.

United Nations Environment Programme 2009 Annual Report (2009). 94 p. Available online: http://www.unep.org/10yfp/programmes/sustainable-buildings-and-constructionprogramme.

World Green Building Trends 2016 report. Available online: https://www.construction.com/toolkit/reports/world-greenbuilding

World Green Building Trends 2018 SmartMarket Report. Available online: https://www.worldgbc.org/news-media/world-green-building-trends-2018-smartmarket-report-publication

World Green Building. Available online: http://www.worldgbc.org

Published

2019-04-01

How to Cite

Kryvomaz Т. I., Scudu, I., Leonard, D., & Minter, D. (2019). Green building BREEAM in Ukraine. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 29(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2019.1.5-15