The prospects of green building developing in Ukraine on example of Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2020.4.20-31Keywords:
green building, certifications rating system, environmental safetyAbstract
This study is an analysis of the data and trends observed in green construction in Ukraine and Poland. Ukraine started developing green building in 2011 and Poland begin in 2008, but despite on little chronologic distance, modern situation in construction industry of these countries has dramatic differences. For today Poland is the leader of Eastern Europe green building with 845 certified objects and four new projects on average are registering every week, while less than 10 certificated green buildings present in all Ukraine. BREEAM is the most popular green certification system in Europe and share 76.8% of total green building market in Poland, but also LEED takes significant shares in education and hotel business, all HQE projects relate to housing, and DGNB appear in logistic and retail. The most perspective sustainable tendency in Poland is increasing green building projects in educational, logistic and industrial sectors. It is could be good example for Ukraine, as well as growing green certification of industrial buildings and residential real estate. Evidence is growing that green buildings bring multiple benefits and driving economic growth around the world. For Ukraine the key factors are promote sustainability in major building companies, create a favorable investment climate, and enlist government support to developing green building.References
Barrientos, J.L., Bhattacharjee, U., Martinez, T. & Duffy, J. J. (2007). Green Buildings in Massachusetts: Comparison between Actual and Predicted Energy Performance. Proceedings of the American Solar Energy Society.
Belniak, S., Gluszak, M., & Zięba, M. (2013). The Supply of Sustainable Office Space in Poland. World of Real Estate Journal, 82, 12-19.
BREEAM Certified Assessments. Retrieved from: http://www.greenbooklive.com
BREEAM. Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. Retrieved from: https://www.breeam.com
DGNB Pre-certified and Certified Projects. Retrieved from: http://www.dgnbsystem.de/en/projects
Digital automation, integration, and twinning services for the construction industry. Retrieved from: https://www.digitalconstructionworks.com
Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2009). Doing Well by Doing Good? Green Office Buildings. American Economic Review, 100, 2492-2509.
Fuerst, F. & McAllister, P. M. (2008). Green Noise or Green Value? Measuring the Price Effects of Environmental Certification in Commercial Buildings. Real Estate Economics, 39(1), 45-69.
Gluszak, M. (2015). Internationalization, Competiveness and Green Building Certification in Europe (chapter 9). In: P. Stanek & K. Wach (Eds.). Europeanization Processes from the Mesoeconomic Perspective: Industries and Policies. Kraków: Cracow University of Economics, 173-191.
HQE. Haute Qualitè Environnementale. Retrieved from: http://www.behqe.com.
IRP (2018). The Weight of Cities: Resource Requirements of Future Urbanization. Swilling, M., Hajer, M., Baynes, T., Bergesen, J., Labbé, F., Musango, J.K., Ramaswami, A., Robinson, B., Salat, S., Suh, S., Currie, P., Fang, A., Hanson, A. Kruit, K., Reiner, M., Smit, S., Tabory, S. A Report by the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kibert, C. (2007). Sustainable Construction. Green Building Design and Delivery. Hoboken (NJ): J. Wiley and Sons.
Kryvomaz, Т., Scudu, I., Leonard, D., & Minter, D. (2019). Green building BREEAM in Ukraine. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 29(1), 5-15. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2019.1.5-15
Kryvomaz, Т., Michaud, A., Varavin, D., & Perebynos, A. (2018). French green building rating systems. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 27(3), 40-48. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2018.3.40-48
Kuczera, A. (2020). Certyfikacja zielonych budynków w liczbach - Raport 2020, PLGBC, 17 pp.
LEED Projects Directory. Retrieved from: http://www.usgbc.org/projects
Lorenz, D. (2006). The Application of the Sustainable Development Principles to the Theory and Practice of Property Valuation, Karlsruhe Schriften zur Bau-, Wohnungs- und Immobilienwirtschaft. Karlsruhe, Germany.
Pivo, G., & Fisher, J. D. (2010). Income, Value and Returns in Socially Responsible Office Properties. Journal of Real Estate Research, 32, 243-270.
Plebankiewicz, E., Juszczyk M., & Kozik R. (2019). Trends, costs, and benefits of green certification of office buildings: a Polish perspective. Sustainability, 11, 23-59.
Polish certified green buildings in numbers – 2019 analysis. Retrieved from: https://plgbc.org.pl/polish-certified-green-buildings-in-numbers-2019-analysis-eng
Polish Green Building Council (PLGBC). Retrieved from: https://plgbc.org.pl
Urbaniec, M., & Gerstlberger, W. (2011). Innovation in environment-oriented networks Influence factors from case study and survey research. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 22(6), 686-704.
WELL Building Standard. Retrieved from: www.wellcertified.com
Wiley, J., Benefield, J., & Johnson, K. (2010). Green Design and the market for commercial office space. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 41, 228-243.
World Business Council For Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Retrieved from: https://www.wbcsd.org
World Green Building Trends 2018 SmartMarket Report. Retrieved from: https://www.worldgbc.org/news-media/world-green-building-trends-2018-smartmarket-report-publication
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Тetiana Kryvomaz, Justyna Chmielewska, Tetiana Kanashchuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal «Environmental safety and natural resources» works under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
The licensing policy is compatible with the overwhelming majority of open access and archiving policies.
